Monday marked another typical event in Apple’s annual tradition of acknowledging noteworthy apps with its “iPhone App of the Year” award. However, this year’s selection seems to overlook a significant trend — the increasing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) within the mobile application environment. Much like the previous year, Apple’s 2024 finalists prominently featured traditional iOS applications focused on specific tasks, like video recording or travel planning, while the AI-driven apps remained conspicuously absent. This raises questions about what Apple values in its app ecosystem and whether it accurately reflects the changing landscape of technology and user preferences.
Among the finalists, we see familiar names like Kino — an app designed for professional video recording — and Runna, which helps tailor personalized running plans. These choices shine a light on Apple’s apparent preference for applications that enhance user experience through practical utility rather than leveraging the transformative potential of AI technologies. With AI systems like ChatGPT gaining substantial traction in recent years, its absence from the list, despite its popularity and innovative features, highlights an inconsistency in Apple’s recognition of what constitutes significant technological advancement.
Despite AI technologies gaining widespread recognition — with ChatGPT reaching an unprecedented 100 million users shortly after its launch — Apple seems hesitant to fully embrace this trend. ChatGPT’s status as a partner in enhancing Siri indicates that Apple is aware of the technology’s potential; nevertheless, its editorial team has chosen to keep AI-powered applications at arm’s length. This approach is puzzling, particularly given the incredible strides ChatGPT has made this year, introducing features such as an Advanced Voice Mode, and competing with established tech giants like Google.
In a striking contrast, the selection of the “App of the Year” by competitors has highlighted the growing preference for innovative solutions that incorporate AI. For example, Google’s recognition of the party-planning application Partiful underscores a departure from strictly traditional app designs, indicating that other tech companies are more willing to celebrate advancements in AI.
While Apple’s general app awards tend to favor traditional applications, it is worth noting that a handful of AI-powered apps made their way into Apple’s various finalist categories. Moises, an application designed to enhance music practice through AI tools, was recognized alongside family-friendly app Bluey: Let’s Play and the creative app Procreate Dreams under the iPad App of the Year. Similarly, Adobe Lightroom, featuring AI-enhanced functionalities, was nominated in conjunction with other renowned productivity and design applications for the Mac platform.
Yet, it is glaringly apparent that even within these categories, the representation of AI-driven applications is scant. Among the 45 nominations across diverse app and game categories, only a fraction spotlighted AI technology prominently. The highlight of a language-learning application, EF Hello, as being “enhanced by AI” further emphasizes the trend where AI is merely an ancillary feature rather than the core driver of the applications being honored.
Apple’s selective list of finalists evidently illustrates a philosophical stance: apps that empower human creativity are prioritized over those designed to automate tasks through AI. Applications that enable users to enhance their skills or to arrange their lives — making them more productive without relying on AI — seem to resonate more with Apple’s editorial vision. Initiatives like Kino exemplify this ethos, as they strive to foster user capabilities rather than serve as a mere automation tool.
The result is a conflicting narrative within the tech landscape; while AI undoubtedly ranks among the most transformative technologies of our time, Apple appears more inclined to celebrate innovation that enhances human agency as opposed to automation. This distaste for overtly AI-driven applications raises essential questions about how the company defines progress and who gets recognition in its increasingly complex ecosystem.
As we gather insights from Apple’s latest announcements, it remains vital to question how this trend may evolve moving forward. The evolution of technology, especially in AI, will continue to shape user experiences and expectations. If Apple aims to stay relevant in an era marked by innovation, it would be prudent to reevaluate its stance toward AI applications and the significant impact they hold within the app market.
With new categories being formed, such as the recently introduced Apple Vision Pro, one must wonder if this signifies a shift towards greater appreciation for innovative applications, including those powered by AI. As consumer preferences and technological advancements converge, acknowledging the value of AI in app selection may be critical for Apple’s narrative in future iterations of its prestigious awards.